Health News Review
  • Oct 30 2005

    Another ill-advised use of “cure”

    When are journalists and scientists going to learn? “Cure” just isn’t an acceptable term to use in describing test tube research, unless you’re talking about a new way to treat ham. An Associated Press story Friday began: “Scientists at the University of Michigan Medical School are part of a team that has discovered a possible [...]

    1 Comment
  • Oct 21 2005

    New Herceptin study > new hype

    Herceptin has been used to treat advanced breast cancer, but three New England Journal of Medicine articles this week suggest the drug could work against an aggressive early-stage breast cancer. Some news stories allow researchers (including a National Cancer Institute researcher) to use words like “cure” in describing the drug. Other experts were quoted calling [...]

    No Comments
  • Oct 12 2005

    Tone down the stem cell hype

    The University of Minnesota issued a news release this week reading, in part: “For the first time, stem cell researchers at the University of Minnesota have coaxed human embryonic stem cells to create cancer-killing cells in the laboratory, paving the way for future treatments for various types of cancers (or tumors). The research will be [...]

    No Comments
  • Oct 5 2005

    A different kind of awareness for Breast Cancer Month

    Canadian drug policy researcher Alan Cassels observes October as breast cancer awareness month by analyzing the hype of breast cancer drug Herceptin. He writes: “The media pushed the glee meter into the red zone, with words like ‘breakthrough,’ ‘wonder drug,’ and ‘impressive advance,’ overblown, laudatory adjectives that I admonish journalism students to strenuously avoid.” Cassels [...]

    1 Comment