Checkup on evidence-based treatment of stroke (or not)

Posted By

Tags

Another excellent piece by John Fauber of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, “Drug that could stop stroke isn’t always used.” This story also includes good graphics and reminders for readers on warning signs of a stroke, how to be prepared for a stroke emergency and what to do in such an emergency.

And, in that newspaper’s partnership with MedPageToday.com, a version of the story appears on that site as well under the headline, “Do Certified Stroke Centers Deliver Speedy Treatment?

Comments

We Welcome Comments. But please note: We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified facts, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who doesn't list what appears to be an actual email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don't give medical advice so we won't respond to questions asking for it. Please see more on our comments policy.

c3

July 28, 2010 at 5:56 pm

Given the modest benefit (based on what I’ve read) this may not be a terrible tragedy. This probably happens because:
1) the window for treatment is 3 hours from onset of symptoms. I assume a lot of stroke patients delay coming in
2)With the single biggest complication of tPA being intracranial hemorrhage. I suspect there’s a persistent reluctance (even when all the dots are aligned) to give a therapy that may WORSEN the symptoms.