Posted by Gary Schwitzer in Health care journalism, Quality of care
Another excellent piece by John Fauber of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, “Drug that could stop stroke isn’t always used.” This story also includes good graphics and reminders for readers on warning signs of a stroke, how to be prepared for a stroke emergency and what to do in such an emergency.
And, in that newspaper’s partnership with MedPageToday.com, a version of the story appears on that site as well under the headline, “Do Certified Stroke Centers Deliver Speedy Treatment?“
Disclaimer: I welcome comments but will delete those with any kind of product pitch, profanity, personal attacks or those from anyone who doesn’t list what appears to be an actual e-mail address. I will also end any thread of comments that are repetitive. Because I moderate comments, I can’t keep reacting to repeatedly inaccurate or unsubstantiated claims. We don't give medical advice so we won't respond to questions asking for it.
c3 posted on July 28, 2010 at 5:56 pm
Given the modest benefit (based on what I’ve read) this may not be a terrible tragedy. This probably happens because:
1) the window for treatment is 3 hours from onset of symptoms. I assume a lot of stroke patients delay coming in
2)With the single biggest complication of tPA being intracranial hemorrhage. I suspect there’s a persistent reluctance (even when all the dots are aligned) to give a therapy that may WORSEN the symptoms.