New cholesterol guidelines present need for shared decision-making

Dr. Victor Montori and two Mayo Clinic colleagues published a perspective piece in JAMA this week,Patient-Centered and Practical Application of New High Cholesterol Guidelines to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease.”

In it, they discuss the new American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for assessing cardiovascular disease and for treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce that risk.  They write that because the guidelines set an arbitrary 10-year risk threshold of 7.5% to begin statin drug treatment, and because “this threshold represents a value judgment about how much absolute cardiovascular disease risk reduction justifies the potential harms, costs, and inconveniences of taking statin medications,” they see a vital role for shared decision-making. There is not, they write, “a single right answer for all patients.” So they call for doctors to “engage the patient in shared decision making using evidence-based approaches.”

They demonstrated one way of doing that, displaying a video example of a patient decision aid on statin or aspirin choice.

Some journalists have told me that shared decision-making is a difficult concept for them to write about.  Maybe the use of a decision aid example, like this one, could help convey the concept, the need, and the prospects.


Follow us on Twitter:

and on Facebook.


Comments (2)

We Welcome Comments. But please note: We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified facts, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who doesn't list what appears to be an actual email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don't give medical advice so we won't respond to questions asking for it. Please see more on our comments policy.

Liz Scherer

February 7, 2014 at 10:56 am

Interesting concept. As a side note, several cardiologists with whom I am currently working have commented that these are not new guidelines, but rather more of a practice update. There is a ton of confusion in the field and the release of these, which appeared to be a haphazard attempt to appease the masses after the endless delay of ATP IV, has only made practice more challenging.

Aleta Kerrick

February 10, 2014 at 12:59 pm

I do like this visual. It’s easier to grasp than text which conveys the same info. But of equal, if not greater, interest would be a graphic showing the number of people who were ALIVE after 10 years. (Even better, alive with good quality of life.) After all, the real goal is not to avoid a heart attack but to live a longer, more enjoyable life.