Health News Review

This week, for the 8th straight year,  I’ll speak about the work of at an annual conference of the Association of Health Care Journalists – this one in Denver.  For this one – as I’ve done in the last couple of such workshops – I’ll tag team with Ivan Oransky, MD, vice president and global editorial director of MedPage Today.  (Thursday, 9 a.m., on the program.)

I don’t think anyone has spoken at this conference for 8 consecutive years on the same topic.

But this may be my last talk about the work of in this setting because we have been forced to abandon our systematic story reviews – once done by a team of more than 20 reviewers – due to a loss of funding.

I’ll certainly still consider invitations to speak based on the experience of my career, but the database of story reviews may stand as it is today, locked at 1,889 story reviews, because I don’t have the funding to pay the terrific team of reviewers that I once had.  There are at least 1,889 lessons in those reviews – all available on the website – about how stories about health care interventions can be done well, and how they can be done so poorly that they may cause harm.

As I’ll ask in my talk, “Who will continue this kind of work?” – the work of independent health care news watchdog in an attempt to improve the public dialogue about health care.


Follow us on Twitter:

and on Facebook.




Imran Ali posted on March 26, 2014 at 10:39 pm

I am passionate about accuracy in medical journalism and would love to volunteer. I am only a resident physician but feel strongly about this.

Gary Fradin posted on April 2, 2014 at 10:48 am

Ditto for me, though only a lowly economist.