Note to our followers: Our nearly 13-year run of daily publication of new content on comes to a close at the end of 2018. Publisher Gary Schwitzer and other contributors may post new articles periodically. But all of the 6,000+ articles we have published contain lessons to help you improve your critical thinking about health care interventions. And those will be still be alive on the site for a couple of years.

Inadvertent disease-mongering of diabetes puts media innumeracy on display

In another of the occasional Hypewatch features on MedPage Today, Kristina Fiore writes, “Hypewatch: 100 Million Diabetic Americans in the Dark?

A third of Americans have diabetes but don’t know it? That’s almost as hard to believe as the IOM’s conclusion that a third of Americans live with severe chronic pain.

The diabetes figure is hard to believe because it’s not true — though you wouldn’t know that from several headlines this week, which proclaimed that three in 10 Americans — which would amount to about 100 million people — have no idea their blood sugars are out of control.

What the headline writers actually meant to say is that a third of Americans who have diabetes don’t know it — and that amounts to a much smaller proportion of the population: about 8 million Americans, or just 3% of the population.

We’ll give the benefit of the doubt to those who botched the stats.  But although unintentional, the harm to the public dialogue and to journalistic credibility is, nonetheless, very real. More than just innumeracy, I’ll call it disease-mongering.

And it’s not a lone example.

We’ve written about media messages that have struggled with incidence data for:

….just to name a few.

Disease-mongering, head-to-toe, is insidious.  Even if it’s unintentional.  If you can’t handle the numbers, you shouldn’t be reporting this stuff.


Follow us on Twitter:

and on Facebook.

You might also like


We Welcome Comments. But please note: We will delete comments left by anyone who doesn’t leave an actual first and last name and an actual email address.

We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified facts, product pitches, or profanity. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. Comments should primarily discuss the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages about health and medicine. This is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science. Nor is it a forum to share your personal story about a disease or treatment -- your comment must relate to media messages about health care. If your comment doesn't adhere to these policies, we won't post it. Questions? Please see more on our comments policy.

Comments are closed.