DCIS dilemma: Dr. Laura Esserman podcast

EssermanDr. Laura Esserman is a surgeon and breast cancer specialist who works at the University of California San Francisco.  The San Francisco Chronicle last year called her a rock star.  She told the newspaper that she is driven by “Passion, persistence and energy. I want to drive efforts to completion: change the way we run clinical trials.”

In short, she is one of the innovators, one of the thought leaders in breast cancer research.

When the recent article by Narod et al, “Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ,” was published  in JAMA Oncology, she co-authored an editorial, “Rethinking the Standard for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treatment.” She pushes a great deal of rethinking about breast cancer screening and treatment.  And DCIS is one of her targets.  

I talked with Dr. Esserman at the Preventing Overdiagnosis 2015 conference at the National Institutes of Health.  We touched on the Narod paper, on DCIS, and on new research initiatives.  Click on the arrow below to hear our podcast with her.

Additional resources:

The music in this episode includes:

  • “Theme from the Absentee” by Crooked Still
  • “Out of Egypt, Into the Great Laugh of Mankind” by Sufjan Stevens

Thanks to Cristeta Boarini for her editing of this podcast.

You can now subscribe to the Health News Watchdog podcast, which is indexed and searchable on the iTunes Store, at:  https://itun.es/i6S86Qw.

Or you can subscribe to the RSS feed for the podcasts:  http://feeds.soundcloud.com/users/soundcloud:users:167780656/sounds.rss

All episodes of our podcasts are archived on this page.

You might also like


We Welcome Comments. But please note: We will delete comments left by anyone who doesn’t leave an actual first and last name and an actual email address.

We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified facts, product pitches, or profanity. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. Comments should primarily discuss the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages about health and medicine. This is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science. Nor is it a forum to share your personal story about a disease or treatment -- your comment must relate to media messages about health care. If your comment doesn't adhere to these policies, we won't post it. Questions? Please see more on our comments policy.

Comments are closed.