We welcome comments, which users can leave at the end of any of our systematic story reviews or at the end of any of our blog posts.
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified facts, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who doesn’t list what appears to be an actual email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don’t give medical advice so we won’t respond to questions asking for it.
We don’t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
We’ve recently written about a sudden burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
“Shed light, not just heat. Facts, challenges, disagreements, corrections — those are all fine. Attacking the person, instead of the idea or the interpretation, is neither acceptable nor helpful.”
We’re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don’t accept advertising on this site and we’re not going to give it away free.
There are multiple ways to search our reviews. You may search by keyword, news source or review rating.