March 2005 Archives

The New York Times and at least one television network newscast profiled a first-of-its-kind aortic valve implant done through a catheter feeding the device through a vein in the patient's leg rather than by open heart surgery.

Why such hype? As the Times reports, the operation was the first of “at least 150 that federal regulators will require before considering approval of the technique for widespread use.”

If the trial fails, will the story get this much coverage? Why can't we wait until there's some evidence?

And costs? The new valve implants are expected to cost between $10,000 and $12,000, which is double the price of surgically implanted valves.

Please see my article on the Poynter Institute website today.

It touches on cheerleading in coverage of health news, on commercialism in health news coverage, on widespread conflicts of interest in the dissemination of health news, on the power of words in health news, and on some of the good things being done to improve the state of health journalism.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from March 2005 listed from newest to oldest.

January 2005 is the previous archive.

April 2005 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.