Cheers & jeers for health care journalists

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

The Integrity in Science Watch project of the Center for Science in the Public Interest has a weekly e-newsletter that includes cheers and jeers for certain aspects of health care journalism. This week's:

* Jeer to Alicia Chang of the Washington Post for failing to mention that the authors of a study supporting the off-label use of drug-eluting stents received funding from Cordis, Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular, all manufacturers of drug-eluting stents.

* Cheer to Stephanie Saul of the New York Times for noting that the American Heart Association, which has defended the cholesterol drug Vytorin in recent weeks, receives $2 million a year from Merck/Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals, the joint venture that markets Vytorin.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.healthnewsreview.org/blog/mt-tb.cgi/6258

Leave a comment.

Enter Comments, but.... I welcome comments but will delete those with product pitches, profanity, personal attacks or those from anyone who doesn't list what appears to be an actual e-mail address. We also don' t give medical advice and won't respond to any questions asking for it.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by published on January 28, 2008 8:06 AM.

Best piece of health care journalism I've seen in a long time was the previous entry in this blog.

Nothing but miracles, breakthroughs, rainbows & unicorns for TODAY Show is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.