WPost responds to "pay for access" allegation

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks

Politico.com has posted the response it got from the Washington Post.

The new posting reads:

The Washington Post has now responded to POLITICO's report this morning that the paper is arranging salons for lobbyists at the home of publisher Katharine Weymouth, events that would include Obama administration officials, members of Congress, and the staffers.

The solicitation -- with costs between $25,000 to $250,000 -- was listed on a flier that circulated to a lobbyist, who later passed it along to POLITICO.

Post spokesperson Kris Coratti has now sent the following statement to POLITICO:

The flier circulated this morning came out of a business division for conferences and events, and the newsroom was unaware of such communication. It went out before it was properly vetted, and this draft does not represent what the company's vision for these dinners are, which is meant to be an independent, policy-oriented event for newsmakers.

As written, the newsroom could not participate in an event like this.

We do believe there is an opportunity to have a conferences and events business, and that The Post should be leading these conversations in Washington, big or small, while maintaining journalistic integrity. The newsroom will participate where appropriate.

Wow. More assaults on the firewall between bean-counters and editorial. What would have happened if Politico.com hadn't reported this?

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.healthnewsreview.org/blog/mt-tb.cgi/6774

1 Comment

maintaining journalistic integrity costs between $25,000 to $250,000, part of that fee I'm sure goes to maintaining the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing policy. The WPost is honest in the same sense a politician is -once bought, stays bought.

Leave a comment.

Enter Comments, but.... I welcome comments but will delete those with product pitches, profanity, personal attacks or those from anyone who doesn't list what appears to be an actual e-mail address. We also don' t give medical advice and won't respond to any questions asking for it.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by published on July 2, 2009 10:02 AM.

Politico.com makes damning accusation against WPost was the previous entry in this blog.

How do Minnesota breast cancer advocates view Klobuchar's support of controversial early breast screening bill? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 4.32-en