The history of uncertainty surrounding mammography

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks

As I've written earlier, the reaction from some people that this week's US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations were "surprising" or "coming out of nowhere" are themselves surprising. Anyone - certainly any informed health care consumer and certainly any journalist- should have known that the uncertainties surrounding mammography have been debated for decades.

There's a nice summary of the history by Charles Bankhead of MedPageToday.com.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.healthnewsreview.org/blog/mt-tb.cgi/7074

2 Comments

Here is even a better piece about the history of breast cancer and mammography. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/opinion/20aronowitz.html?_r=1

Leave a comment.

Enter Comments, but.... I welcome comments but will delete those with product pitches, profanity, personal attacks or those from anyone who doesn't list what appears to be an actual e-mail address. We also don' t give medical advice and won't respond to any questions asking for it.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by published on November 20, 2009 8:43 AM.

People should have known more about USPSTF all along was the previous entry in this blog.

Kudos to Nancy Snyderman for some of her mammography explanations this week is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 4.32-en