NYT story examines criticism of cancer center ads

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks

Natasha Singer's story looks at ads for cancer centers that tout high cure rates and low risk but no evidence to back that up. Testimonials rule the message. She writes:

"In medical science, such anecdotal data would not be considered statistically valid. But ads for nonprofit medical centers are not held to scientific standards of evidence.


....If a drug maker ran an ad for a cancer medicine, Food and Drug Administration regulations would require the company to be able to support any superiority claims with substantial evidence from rigorous clinical studies.

But federal agencies cannot limit the ad claims made by nonprofit medical centers about their ability to cure people of diseases like cancer, according to the government's main ad regulator, the Federal Trade Commission.

Cancer experts interviewed for this article say there are no comprehensive statistics showing that any one elite medical center has better overall cancer success rates than its competitors. "

It's an important story. Read the whole thing at the link above. And don't miss the great use of multimedia - with radio, TV and print ads included in the online story in the left margin.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.healthnewsreview.org/blog/mt-tb.cgi/7157

2 Comments

Contrary to some notions, good researched articles still fetch in reviewers like me. You paraded broad understanding of the theme matter and my views are now complete after reading your post. Please sustain up the effective work and i will subscribe to your rss feed to be enlightened of any future postings.

NCI-designated cancer centers are a very large business which act as a base of power for academic clinical oncologists who've had control of clinical cancer research since the time Nixon first declared war on cancer.

Over the past couple of years, if you watched TV with any regularity, it would have been difficult to miss the direct to consumer advertising that touted the benefits of some drugs over others, especially for patients undergoing treatment for cancer.

Even to the point that buses covered with "shrink wrapped" advertising being strategically placed outside major cancer centers for patients and their families to see (EPO anyone?).

Leave a comment.

Enter Comments, but.... I welcome comments but will delete those with product pitches, profanity, personal attacks or those from anyone who doesn't list what appears to be an actual e-mail address. We also don' t give medical advice and won't respond to any questions asking for it.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Gary Schwitzer published on December 19, 2009 8:48 AM.

Reader questions balance, integrity of NJ web story on medical imaging cutbacks was the previous entry in this blog.

Turning osteopenia into a disease is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.