Health News Review
  • Feb 3 2012

    The Komen Kollection

    There has been no need for the Watchdog to weigh in on the Planned Parenthood/Komen fiasco this week.  We generally tend to write about things that otherwise might go un-noticed.  This issue – deservedly – was inescapable this week in news stories and through social media. We remind you that we tend to focus on [...]

    1 Comment 1 Star
  • Feb 1 2012

    Under-reported prostate cancer news: study questions proton beam therapy; NJ clash between evidence & politics

    As far as I can tell, Marilynn Marchione of the AP is the only mainstream news media journalist to report that  “A study of Medicare records found that men treated with proton beams later had one-third more bowel problems, such as bleeding and blockages, than similar men given conventional radiation.” She reports that results “were [...]

    2 Comments 1 Star
  • Jan 11 2012

    Health policy fear-mongering fraud on radio call-in show – how often does this occur on American airwaves?

    In more than 7 years of blogging about health care messages affecting the public dialogue, I don’t think I’ve ever written before about radio call-in programs.  But this one hit pretty close to home. Nothing makes me more upset than people fear-mongering and lying about health care to suit their own interests. I don’t listen [...]

    3 Comments 1 Star
  • Dec 22 2011

    Unwrapping early presents, wrapping up ’11 Health Wonk Review series

    A sleigh led by a dog. Hey, the red-nosed reindeer had nothing on this mutt.  Like Rudolph’s maiden voyage with the fat man, this is the Watchdog’s first time hosting the Wonk Review.  So buckle up for a wild ride.     Man, there’s a lot in Santa’s bag:  unbundling the bundle in the jungle, [...]

    3 Comments 1 Star
  • Nov 1 2011

    Cancer expert asks “Are we as a society prepared to pay attention to scientific evidence?”

    It’s ironic that this now makes three consecutive entries on this blog that all relate to public misconceptions or misunderstanding of how science works. • Yesterday I blogged about a science writer’s lament about how reader comments sometimes display an inability to accept evidence. • Earlier today I posted a humorous piece from The Daily [...]

    1 Comment
  • Oct 26 2011

    British breast cancer screening now under independent review

    Questions about how best to communicate to the public about the tradeoffs of potential benefits versus potential harms of mammography do not end at America’s shores. The Guardian of London reports: An independent investigation into breast cancer screening has been set up by the government’s cancer chief to try to settle the growing controversy around [...]

    No Comments
  • Oct 13 2011

    The limitations of progression-free survival as an endpoint – NPR addresses

    On the NPR Shots blog, Scott Hensley addresses, “Avastin For Breast Cancer: Hope Versus False Hope.” Excerpt: Any day now FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg is expected to make a final decision on Avastin’s fate. Women who said Avastin helped their breast cancer were out in force at a June hearing of an appeal of FDA’s [...]

    5 Comments
  • Oct 12 2011

    Newt Gingrich’s dangerous political rhetoric on prostate cancer screening

    The New York Times reports about last night’s televised debate among Republican presidential candidates: Newt Gingrich, the former House speaker, condemned a proposal of a government task force to end routine tests for prostate cancer in men, saying it would cause deaths. But the panel that made the recommendation concluded the test itself has caused [...]

    5 Comments
  • Jul 6 2011

    Another round of state laws mandating screening tests “that may have little effect on outcomes”

    USA Today reports on 14 states considering some move toward mandating a newborn test looking for signs of congenital heart disease. Excerpt: “The tests aren’t always accurate, however, and some doctors say they will prompt follow-up tests that could prove expensive — perhaps as much as $1,500. “No question about it raising health care costs, [...]

    No Comments
  • May 31 2011

    Radioactive health care debate: MN moratorium on radiation treatment centers

    In the Saint Paul Pioneer Press, Christopher Snowbeck reports, “Health care debate that’s radioactive: where to build the region’s radiation treament centers.” Excerpts: “…radiation treatment centers… cost millions of dollars to build and have been the subject of fierce debates in Minnesota about where they should be located and who should be allowed to operate [...]

    No Comments