Launching The Site
Created 04/16/06
HealthNewsReview.org is an attempt to help improve the accuracy, balance and completeness of news stories that make claims about new ideas in health care. It is not intended to belittle the hard work of well-intentioned journalists. I covered health and medical news on a daily basis for 15 years and I know about deadline pressures. I know you don't always have the time and space you need. I know that you don't call all the shots - that editors or producers or news directors play a significant role in what is finally reported.
Our ratings criteria are clear and fair. And, yes, they're tough. Journalists may ask, "How can you expect us to cover all of these in each story?" But good health care journalists find a way to fit this information into their stories (see a five-star example on this site). One thing is inarguable: consumers need this information in order to make good health care decisions. We set the bar high. Consumers deserve nothing less.
We also want to thank the Media Doctor websites in Australia and Canada - our inspiration for this site.
A top Canadian health care journalist, Andre Picard of The Globe and Mail of Toronto, has been reviewed by the Media Doctor Canada project. In a recent e-mail to me, Picard wrote: "I actually like having my stories reviewed because we get so little useful feedback." Once he received a weaker two-star grade for a vaccine story. "When I looked back at the two star effort I thought: ‘Yes, there's some basic info missing.’ When I wrote another vaccine story recently, I was more careful and thorough. Some of my colleagues complain that the criteria are unfair, that they don't have room to get everything in every story. I don't have a lot of sympathy for that - and most of my stories are in the 400-800 word range."
We hope that U.S. journalists find our reviews helpful and accept the constructive criticism. This project is intended to support excellence in health and medical journalism. But it's also intended to help news consumers and health care consumers get the information they need to make decisions.
Gary Schwitzer
Publisher

HealthNewsReview.org
Other "Notes from Publisher"
July 7, 2008 Update At The 600-Story Mark
June 9, 2008 In Our Forum: Reviewer Adds Comments On Hype, USNWR Acne Story
May 27, 2008 Some Journalists’ “Kid In The Candy Store” Portrayal of US Health Care
April 25, 2008 Terrible Two With a New Look for You
December 30, 2007 Bothered By "Breakthroughs"
December 20, 2007 Does your language fit the evidence?
November 8, 2007 News releases & scientific meetings: A guest editor column
October 24, 2007 How four stories fared in covering Alzheimer's blood test study
September 23, 2007 Reader response to "Too Brief To Matter" discussion
September 14, 2007 Too Brief To Matter - Part Two: The benefits/harms of briefs & digests
August 20, 2007 Finalist for 2007 International Health & Medical Media Award
June 14, 2007 WINNER OF FIRST-EVER MIRROR AWARD HONORING EXCELLENCE IN MEDIA INDUSTRY REPORTING
May 29, 2007 HealthNewsReview.org a finalist for first-ever Mirror Awards
March 30, 2007 Networks’ pro-screening enthusiasm
March 14, 2007 Troubling TV Health News Trends
January 28, 2007 Too Brief To Matter
December 11, 2006 Scores on Eight Lung Cancer Screening Stories
November 16, 2006 COMPARING DIFFERENT MEDIA ON THE SAME STORY
October 17, 2006 Newspapers lift wire stories, but may miss the best of the original story.
July 27, 2006 Public response to HealthNewsReview.org
June 18, 2006 CNN screening advice for women
May 11, 2006 CNN screening advice for men
April 16, 2006 Launching the site
|
|