Terrible Two With A New Look For You
Created 4/25/08
We're two years old and we already got a facelift. Welcome to the new HealthNewsReview.org. Besides a new design and layout, we've added an important new functional change with the addition of a prominent "Join the Discussion" forum on the home page.
We never wanted our reviews to be a lecture. We want to open a dialogue among our reviewers, journalists, news consumers, health care consumers and others who want to discuss the state of health journalism.
But the way we originally designed the website didn’t accommodate such a dialogue very effectively. We think the new site will open the doors so we can hear you better.
The goal - as it's always been - is to improve health journalism.
Oh, if only all news organizations could match the recent record of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. Earlier this month, that paper nabbed our top five-star score for a story on a drug's impact on obesity and cardiovascular disease. What's worth noting is that this paper - not among the nation's biggest in circulation - has already been rated with our top five-star score four times - and we've only given that top score 45 times in two years. This time our reviewers said, "The story was well written and would enable a reader to appreciate the complexity of assessing the impact of a medication. It was clear, balanced and succinct - running less than 600 words."
Unfortunately, there are many other recent examples at the other end of the spectrum. As I write this, on the home page, there's a lowly one star story on Botox by Newsweek. 60 Minutes was talking about a cancer cure and got one of our lowest ratings. ABC's Good Morning America launched into a "lunchtime lipo" discussion and didn't get many cheers from us. And the New York Daily News got zero stars - one of only 14 shutouts we've ever given after two years and 542 stories reviewed. We thought: "The Daily News editors should be embarrassed for allowing this story into print."
So the door is open. It's your website, too. Come on in and join the discussion.
Gary Schwitzer
Publisher

HealthNewsReview.org
Other "Notes from Publisher"
April 25, 2008 Terrible Two With a New Look for You
December 30, 2007 Bothered By "Breakthroughs"
December 20, 2007 Does your language fit the evidence?
November 8, 2007 News releases & scientific meetings: A guest editor column
October 24, 2007 How four stories fared in covering Alzheimer's blood test study
September 23, 2007 Reader response to "Too Brief To Matter" discussion
September 14, 2007 Too Brief To Matter - Part Two: The benefits/harms of briefs & digests
August 20, 2007 Finalist for 2007 International Health & Medical Media Award
June 14, 2007 WINNER OF FIRST-EVER MIRROR AWARD HONORING EXCELLENCE IN MEDIA INDUSTRY REPORTING
May 29, 2007 HealthNewsReview.org a finalist for first-ever Mirror Awards
March 30, 2007 Networks’ pro-screening enthusiasm
March 14, 2007 Troubling TV Health News Trends
January 28, 2007 Too Brief To Matter
December 11, 2006 Scores on Eight Lung Cancer Screening Stories
November 16, 2006 COMPARING DIFFERENT MEDIA ON THE SAME STORY
October 17, 2006 Newspapers lift wire stories, but may miss the best of the original story.
July 27, 2006 Public response to HealthNewsReview.org
June 18, 2006 CNN screening advice for women
May 11, 2006 CNN screening advice for men
April 16, 2006 Launching the site
|
|