Health News Review

On a subject that is easily sensationalized, this story was measured and analytical in its reporting of a very preliminary study.

 

Our Review Summary

For every claim there was a caution.

And an independent perspective delivered caveats and limitations that were important for reader understanding.


Why This Matters

Additional treatments for MS symptoms are needed and are an important element in the MS Society 2011-2015 strategic response. Stories about treatments for MS symptoms are going to get a lot of attention from patients and families dealing with that diagnosis.  This story was careful, cautious and helpful in explaining a very small, very short-term study. Until this published study, only anecdotal evidence of the benefits of marijuana in MS induced spasticity existed.  This study provides the first clinical trial evidence.

 


Criteria

Not Satisfactory

Does the story adequately discuss the costs of the intervention?

Not Satisfactory

Somebody had to pay for the marijuana used in the study.  And somebody would have to pay something if it were used therapeutically.  A cost estimate would have helped.  Not everybody knows this stuff.

Satisfactory

Does the story adequately quantify the benefits of the treatment/test/product/procedure?

Satisfactory

Many times a story stops at reporting something like “brought some relief.”

This story explained exactly how the study was conducted, what the measurement scale for improvement was, and what was observed on that scale.

And then it carefully itemized limitations of the study.

Satisfactory

Does the story adequately explain/quantify the harms of the intervention?

Satisfactory

The story included the important quote, “We can’t say anything about long-term effects.”

And, short term, the story reported that the study found some patients had fatigue and dizziness.

Satisfactory

Does the story seem to grasp the quality of the evidence?

Satisfactory

The story carefully itemized several limitations of the research:

  • “blinding” issues and the quote “It’s pretty clear that the patients were not really blinded.  What effects that might have had on the results is unclear.”
  • effects studied over only a few days.

The story could have commented more strongly about the small sample size as well.

Satisfactory

Does the story commit disease-mongering?

Satisfactory

No disease-mongering of spasticity of MS.

Satisfactory

Does the story use independent sources and identify conflicts of interest?

Satisfactory

One independent perspective was used in the story, and it contributed a great deal to the context and balance.

Satisfactory

Does the story compare the new approach with existing alternatives?

Satisfactory

The story explained that the marijuana was used in subjects who had failed to get better with standard medication.

Satisfactory

Does the story establish the availability of the treatment/test/product/procedure?

Satisfactory

The story explained that some people with MS are already using medical marijuana to treat certain symptoms.

Satisfactory

Does the story establish the true novelty of the approach?

Satisfactory

The study briefly referenced past research suggesting that cannabinoid receptors on cells help regulate muscle spasticity.

Satisfactory

Does the story appear to rely solely or largely on a news release?

Satisfactory

It’s clear that the story did not rely solely on a news release.

Total Score: 9 of 10 Satisfactory


We Welcome Comments

But please note: We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified facts, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who doesn't list what appears to be an actual email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don't give medical advice so we won't respond to questions asking for it. Please see more on our comments policy.