This story about new migraine prevention guidelines didn’t mention the industry conflicts that pervade the writing committee that issued the recommendations.
This story pointed out the many connections between the guideline authors and the drug industry–something the competing USA Today coverage missed. But the story wasn’t as specific about potential benefits or harms.
The use of “hokum” in a headline always makes us smile, but despite the fact that the story met many of our criteria, we weren’t all smiles after reading it.
This story never clearly explained what information is conveyed by a positive or negative test and how the result might be useful for decision-making in patients with cognitive impairment.
A story based on another news organization’s story. If someone else’s work is to be copied, we’d suggest copying the Behind the Headlines review.
Despite what the headline projects, you really can’t tell whether or how much a new device may help after tests in 7 people.
Read that headline above. What does “may be coming soon” mean to you? Don’t hold your breath if soon implies to you anything like the standard definition of “a short time.”
We don’t doubt that some of the sleep apnea sufferers cited in this story are truly excited about being able to sleep without having a bulky device on their faces. But stories like this owe it to readers to separate individual enthusiasm from clinical evidence.
This is the kind of story that might leave womens’ heads spinning.