The editor of Milwaukee Magazine writes: “Perhaps the most under-covered issue in the Milwaukee metro area is the cost of healthcare. Medical costs are killing this community in both public and private sectors.
Last week, a study by the Greater Milwaukee Business Foundation on Health Inc. found that physician fees for 13 procedures done by specialists are 30% to 40% higher in the Milwaukee area than in several other Midwestern cities. The group previously found that hospital costs in the Milwaukee area were among the nation’s highest. And past studies by others have shown that Milwaukee’s overall medical care costs were 25% higher than in other metro areas. …
How can you possibly freeze taxes and continue services when your operations, as is true of all governments, are heavily driven by personnel, by employees who get health insurance coverage? When one of your biggest costs has gone up 87%, more than four times faster than inflation, how do you avoid budget increases? Adding to the irony is that any property tax increase to help defray these costs will not be paid by hospitals because they are tax-exempt nonprofits, even though they annually report “profits??? and pay their executives mega-salaries.
Meanwhile, consider the impact on the private sector. How can Milwaukee’s businesses compete with those elsewhere when they are forced to absorb a cost for health insurance premiums that is so out of control? The business lobbying group, Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce, jumps on every tax that impacts businesses. Meanwhile, it seems to ignore a tidal wave of annual added costs coming from medical care inflation.
Ironically, local business leaders sit on the boards of local hospitals that are helping to drive these costs ever upward. Traditionally, these volunteers help raise donations for hospitals. Today, their time might be better spent demanding an explanation of rising costs.
I don’t claim to have any solutions to this crisis. But it’s a safe bet nothing will happen until more attention is paid to the issue. And the media can help make that happen.“ (my emphasis added)
Opinions on other issues in news, journals, PR, advertising, marketing
Come on, NY Times; you must do better than this. Important research doesn’t need hype and the “breaking news” BS doesn’t help readers or patients. https://www.healthnewsreview.org/2022/03/nyt-proclaims-breaking-news/
Our editorial team was blessed to have Sharon as a contributor during our best years. As this obit states, she was “kind, patient, wise, thoughtful and generous.” Thank you, Sharon; now rest in peace. https://journalism.wisc.edu/news/in-memoriam-sharon-dunwoody-1947-2022/
We’ve written about the hype of liquid biopsies for years (see link in comment below). And now this…. https://www.statnews.com/2022/01/12/medicare-shouldnt-cover-liquid-biopsies-early-cancer-detection/
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Comments are closed.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like