NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine -

News coverage of a new prostate cancer test

Posted By


For a look at how two different news organizations covered the news of a potentially more accurate test for prostate cancer, see the review of a weaker ABC News story in contrast with the review of a stronger Baltimore Sun story.

However, neither story adequately addressed the fact that while a more accurate test may tell who has prostate cancer better, it still does not tell which men need treatment in their lifetime and which men don’t, which is the real problem in prostate cancer screening. So, both stories left readers and viewers with an overly optimistic view of what screening can do.

You might also like


Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.


May 7, 2007 at 10:31 am

Yeah, the same way mammograms have been sold as the “perfect” test for breast cancer. The media needs to print stories like this to fill space, not educate anyone.
Its this ongoing belief that the “public deserves to know” before consensus can be reached and years of study can prove things. They’re not told that one study proves nothing.

Cancer Breakthroughs

May 15, 2007 at 3:36 pm

I totally agree. And not only is it a story to fill space but the test itself just a way to make more money…