I’ve blogged in the past about TV news operations accepting sponsored news deals with local medical centers. In these deals, oftentimes the news only includes perspectives from that sponsoring hospital.
Now, in the first instance I’m aware of, the trend has come to newspapers. The HometownAnnapolis.com website of The Capital newspaper yesterday announced:
Partnership should improve health coverage
Published March 16, 2008
By TOM MARQUARDTIn today’s editions we are experimenting with a new concept that could alarm some readers: Anne Arundel Medical Center, or AAMC, has paid us to provide content for our Health & Fitness page once a month.
Newspapers don’t normally sell access to news pages, and certainly we would not give away content privileges on any other news page. I’m sure County Executive John Leopold would love to have his staff write the stories for the front page, but that’s not going to happen for any price.
But partnering with the hospital on the Health page seemed to make sense. We don’t have a health reporter to write about medical issues and often use stories from syndicated services that quote doctors from other cities.
The local hospital is giving us stories about local physicians and programs it has to offer – in their words, without an effort to balance the copy with comments from other hospitals or from doctors who don’t practice at AAMC.
The stories are written in newspaper style and the hospital staff is responsible for the page’s design. To be open and transparent about the partnership, a disclaimer is clearly displayed at the top of the page.
I’m not entirely comfortable with the arrangement, purely for journalistic reasons. But in the end I think the reader benefits – and that’s my goal.
Instead of generic stories originating from another city, the reader will have local news featuring people they recognize, doctors they use and services that are available to them. The hospital staff is getting to the stories we are not able to write because of other priorities.
Is the page more readable now? You tell me.
Wow. “Partnering” – or being paid by a hospital to provide their news? Actually, he calls it content, not news. Whew. Because we used to call that advertising.
Also a relief – “the stories are written in newspaper style and the hospital staff is responsible for the page’s design.” So they’ll look professional! Just like, or maybe even better than, real news.
And who cares if we give readers only one side of a story? Maybe a side that is so incomplete it can hurt them? And so what if we don’t disclose the financial conflicts of interest of the doctors who might appear in the stories written and designed by the hospital itself? And so what if there are other opinions or other approaches from other doctors on the other side of town that don’t get covered?
The main thing is: “Is the page more readable now?”
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Ms. Jan
March 18, 2008 at 11:22 amI wonder what the hospital’s competitors think about this. Were they given a chance to become part of this “partnership?” If the competitors submit editorials and letters to the editor about the “partnership,” will they get printed?
Marilyn
March 18, 2008 at 3:43 pmI totally agree with you. This is ridiculous.
Marilyn
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like