NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.

How a headline can ruin a health/science story

Posted By

Tags

Recently a physician friend brought the following to my attention. The same story, written by the same person, but appearing under two very different headlines.

Here’s the original New York Times headline:

NYT.png

The story stated at one point: “No one knows whether vaccinations had anything to do with the girls’ health problems, and the scientific significance of individual cases is always difficult to assess.”

But the Seattle Times picked up the NYT story and used this headline:

Seattle times.png

The Seattle headline gives the misleading impression that there’s a causal link between autism and vaccines. This is the kind of thing that gives headline writers a bad rep.

You might also like

Comments

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Comments are closed.