It is a joy to pass along news like this:
“He no longer has a job directing news, but Glen Mabie now has an ethics award to add to his journalism credits.
The Society of Professional Journalists announced Monday that Mabie, former WEAU TV-13 news director, won the organization’s national Ethics in Journalism Award, awarded annually to journalists who act in accordance with the SPJ code of ethics. The award will be given Sept. 6 in Atlanta.
Mabie was recognized for the award after resigning from his news director position in January when he objected to an agreement between the TV station and Sacred Heart Hospital in which TV-13 would run medical stories featuring Sacred Heart employees and not those of other Chippewa Valley hospitals or clinics.
Broadcasting programming featuring Sacred Heart content exclusively didn’t sit well with Mabie, who noted the resulting conflict of interest that called the newsroom’s objectivity into question.
Mabie and other TV-13 newsroom staff protested the agreement but were initially unable to convince management to cancel the deal. Mabie subsequently resigned, and the TV station’s management canceled the deal with Sacred Heart.
Mabie said he is humbled by the award and credited his former TV-13 news colleagues with their protest of the agreement.
“Many of the people in that newsroom deserve this honor just as much as I do,” he said. “To see those people stand up for those ethical guidelines was really neat.”
Opinions on other issues in news, journals, PR, advertising, marketing
A lot of interesting workshops are happening now at the #NBCCSummit! @garyschwitzer, the publisher of @HealthNewsRevu, is discussing new cancer research news. #BeBold
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Comments are closed.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like