NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.

Reader’s Digest stops drinking the Cure Kool-Aid

Posted By

Tags

Get out and buy the April issue of RD and frame it.

RD has a history of proclaiming more cures than a ham processor. Two examples:

Reader's Digest BAck Pain cure cover.JPG Reader's Digest New Cures cover.gif

But “the little magazine that could” finally did publish an evidence-based health journalism piece.

Shannon Brownlee’s thoughtful “What’s Wrong with Cancer Tests” piece will be good bathroom reading for thousands, we hope.

Sorry I can’t offer a link. RD doesn’t offer them.

You might also like

Comments

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Alan Cassels

March 11, 2009 at 11:16 am

It’s about time someone took off the globes to expose the Reader’s Digest’s fluff health pieces typically rife with hype and exaggeration. Perhaps the standard RD “cure” narrative sells magazines, but at a cost of massive deception for the health-information seeking public. If they are starting to employ the likes of Shannon Brownlee, whose book Overtreated should be required reading for any Reader’s Digest editor, then that is surely a good sign.