From last week’s NPR program:
A segment entitled “Blame Canada,” with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’s Maureen Taylor explaining what health care is really like north of the border. Excerpt:
MIKE PESCA: What do Canadians make of how their health care system is being portrayed in the U.S. these days?
MAUREEN TAYLOR: I think we’re actually saddened that you could use something that we find works so well, the Canadian health care system, to scare Americans into voting this down and being afraid to move forward with this.
And a segment called “The language of reform” with Frank Luntz, author and Republican wordsmith, who wrote a memo called “The Language of Healthcare 2009.” He says his ten rules will help Republicans stop the “Washington takeover” of health care.
Opinions on other issues in news, journals, PR, advertising, marketing
Puleeeeease... this 'game changer' weight loss drug causes more nausea and vomiting than a placebo. Some game, some change. My friend Gary would spank you for using the eighth word medical reporters should never, ever use. @garyschwitzer @thackerpd
https://www.healthnewsreview.org/toolkit/just-journalists-writing-tips-case-studies/7-words-and-more-you-shouldnt-use-in-medical-news/ https://twitter.com/OttawaCitizen/status/1361426796126830597
A scary @statnews Op-Ed warns that govt attempts to rein in Pharma may cut off access to "life-changing" drugs.
It takes @garyschwitzer to let us know: the author spent 10 years as Pfizer's public-policy chief. https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer/status/1360325022578053123
.@TranspariMED criticizes STAT op-ed for not disclosing pharma funding of author’s institute - similar to criticism we’ve made of STAT op-eds in the past. @transparify @ThinkTankWatch @icer_review https://www.healthnewsreview.org/2021/02/transparency-watchdog-criticizes-stats-non-disclosure-on-pro-pharma-op-ed/
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Alan
July 30, 2009 at 9:52 amMy guess is that no matter what happens in this country it is likely to be a train wreck as the quality of the debate is so bad. Characterizations of nationalized systems in other countries, both pro and con, are often little more than very selective propaganda.
There’s a nice discussion of the British NHS relative to other systems in the BMJ that points to a rather mixed and complex picture. See Delamothe T. How the NHS measures up. BMJ. 2008 Jun 28; 336(7659): 1469-71. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/336/7659/1469. And that’s been my family’s experience of the NHS. They provide great care for my grandmother in her final years when she had dementia but the way my father’s stroke was managed a few years ago was atrociously bad, and my mother is able to walk without pain because she didn’t accept the NHS’s determination that her condition wasn’t treatable and she had enough money to get her knee fixed at a private German clinic.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like