NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.

Fair and balanced – CNN adopts Fox approach to mammography story

Posted By

Tags

Was it Bill O’Reilly I was hearing? Sean Hannity?

No, it was CNN’s Dr. Sanjay Gupta, badgering Lucy Marion, PhD, RN, a member of the US Preventive Services Task Force in what felt like a paternalistic, heavy-handed, show-how-tough-you-can-be style.

Screen shot 2010-03-08 at 4.48.14 PM.png

His line of questioning:

“Are you comfortable with what you’re saying?

You’re a nurse….What you’re saying is that some lives are not worth it – that’s why we’re changing these recommendations.

That’s an incredibly frightening thing to hear from someone like yourself. Is that what you’re saying?”

The “you’re a nurse” comment could be interpreted many ways. One of them could be, “I’m a doctor and you’re only a nurse….” That was certainly the tone of the interview.

This segment was brought to my attention by a reader of this blog – who wrote:

“She was basically made to defend a position (that Dr. Gupta asserted as fact) that she thinks increased deaths due to reduced screening are okay. It was a pretty crappy tactic.

…It’s a shame that a physician would use his credibility to bolster the tactics of hit-and-run media, but that’s about what this amounts to. …

I hope physicians-that-are-also-journalists start realizing that by (ab)using their positions of trust as doctors to lend credibility to hit-and-run stories, they cheapen both medicine and journalism.”

You might also like

Comments

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Wellescent Health Blog

November 18, 2009 at 4:53 pm

It is unfortunate to see such tactics in the interview instead of trying to understand the why behind changing the recommended screening guidelines. A combination of policy and evidence-based analysis has gone into making this recommendation, so it would best serve the public if the reasons were explored instead of being dismissed.

K.Hartley

November 18, 2009 at 5:13 pm

and don’t forget he conveniently ignored her PhD title of Dr. Marion by calling her Mrs. Marion. I guess he wanted to make sure viewers didn’t mistake her for a medical doctor like himself – she was just a nurse after all. He was extremely condescending and as a woman I found his interviewing style offensive. I don’t know how Dr. Marion kept her cool, but I did enjoy her response to “you’re a nurse…” with “and you are a physician” – she didn’t let his cheap shots get to her.

Myke Locksmith

November 19, 2009 at 2:50 pm

Almost all of what we think is journalism is nothing more than biased editorial commentary. I’ve never felt such a division of the country I do today. The tactics that are used by both sides of the fence are despicable, insulting to the intelligence of the American people, and pose little hope for progress and improvement. It truly saddens me.

Roshan

November 19, 2009 at 10:57 pm

This guy was being considered to be our Surgeon General???? By insulting the intelligence of USPSTF members, Dr. Gupta and others are seriously undermining their own credibility.