NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.

The history of uncertainty surrounding mammography

Posted By

Tags

As I’ve written earlier, the reaction from some people that this week’s US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations were “surprising” or “coming out of nowhere” are themselves surprising. Anyone – certainly any informed health care consumer and certainly any journalist- should have known that the uncertainties surrounding mammography have been debated for decades.

There’s a nice summary of the history by Charles Bankhead of MedPageToday.com.

You might also like

Comments

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Marilyn Mann

November 20, 2009 at 2:06 pm

Here is David Rind’s take on this:
http://www.evidenceinmedicine.org/2009/11/uspstf-mammography-and-grading-recommendations.html

Teresa Hagen

November 20, 2009 at 3:53 pm

Here is even a better piece about the history of breast cancer and mammography. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/opinion/20aronowitz.html?_r=1