Promoting screening irrespective of the evidence may garner votes but will not create healthier voters

Posted By



That’s a line from a commentary entitled, “The Benefits and Harms of Mammography Screening: Understanding the Trade-offs,” published in the Journal of the American Medical Association this week by Dartmouth’s Steve Woloshin and Lisa Schwartz.

Blogger Merrill Goozner did a good job summarizing the piece. So far he’s the only journalist I’ve seen who’s written about the article as I go to post this.

As the authors wrote:

“…people need balanced information. Simplistic slogans touting only the benefit are deceptive. Simple, standardized summaries (and they provide a table of some) about the benefits and harms of testing would help foster good decision making.”

That’s something journalists struggle with every day in telling health care stories – as we’ve shown over and over on

You might also like


Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Comments are closed.