NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.

An extra 0.7 "satisfying sexual events" per month

Posted By

Categories

Ray Moynihan, who has written quite a bit about the disease-mongering of female sexual dysfunction, now writes in the BMJ (subscription required for full access):

“The definitions of female sexual dysfunction and its disorders of desire, arousal, orgasm, and pain are facing a major overhaul as part of the current revision of the influential Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).

A working group for the American Psychiatric Association, which produces the manual, has proposed new definitions that give greater acknowledgment to the relationship context of women’s sexual difficulties and new criteria to raise the threshold for diagnosis.”

Moynihan writes that one working group member described current criteria for “hypoactive sexual desire disorder” as being “highly problematic,” and that a woman’s lack of sexual desire may sometimes be a “normal reaction to a problematic context and therefore should not be pathologized.” He writes that another working group member stated that in order “to avoid pathologizing normal variation in sexual experiences” women’s mild and passing sexual problems should not be regarded as symptoms of a medical dysfunction.

Further excerpts:

“The group has proposed abandoning the two existing disorders of desire and arousal and merging them into a new entity potentially labelled “sexual arousability disorder.” Under its proposals, symptoms may have to be of a certain severity and to present for more than six months before a woman qualifies for a diagnosis.

It is unclear how the proposal to move away from the label “hypoactive sexual desire disorder” will affect drug companies–including Boehringer Ingelheim–that are currently testing products to treat the condition. Boehringer Ingelheim recently released abstracts suggesting that its drug flibanserin could offer woman an extra 0.7 “satisfying sexual events” per month, over and above the effects of a placebo.

For more than a decade some researchers have claimed that the condition called female sexual dysfunction affects 43% of women, though others believe the true prevalence is far less.”

The American Psychiatric Association has now posted all the proposed revisions online.

The Wall Street Journal had a good overall look at the DSM draft revisions.

So did the Los Angeles Times.

ABC had a piece that at least raised the question, “Are We Over-Diagnosing Mental Disorders?”

You might also like

Comments

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Comments are closed.