NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine -

Association of Health Care Journalists conference convenes in Chicago

Posted By


I’ll be presenting along with Ivan Oransky tomorrow on “How to read medical studies and avoid pitfalls in reporting on them.

Screen shot 2010-04-22 at 11.47.07 AM.pngIt will also be a preview of an upcoming AHCJ guide for members on this same topic – a guide I’ve written with Ivan as eagle-eyed editor.

I’ll share my opinion that we have too much reporting on studies – at least far too much that doesn’t evaluate the evidence and emphasizes benefits while minimizing harms of new interventions. We should be spending a lot more time on the quality of care, on costs, on access, on disparities, on shared decision-making issues where the rubber meets the road in the interaction between people and their health care providers.

You might also like


Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Comments are closed.