April 15, 2010
NBC’s obsession with baldness "breakthroughs"
Somebody at NBC must be obsessed with baldness. About three years ago, their Nightly News devoted more than two minutes to questionable hype of a “laser hair comb breakthrough.”
Last night anchor Brian Williams whipped the worried well into a frenzy with his lead in, saying:
“Now to the relationship between humans and their hair. It ranges between frustration, obsession and desperation….We’re talking about people who would pay any price, bear any burden to keep it, grow it, put it back.”
That was his set-up for an announcement of what he called a “big development” – the discovery of what they called a “human hair control gene” that NBC said may lead to a baldness treatment.
[2017 Update: This NBC video is no longer available but the transcript is available HERE ]
Interesting science. But the piece had more comedy clips from Seinfeld and Larry David and man-on-the-street interviews than it did evidence. And in showing the full-head-of-hair researcher who once had alopecia areata but then was “cured” by doctors, the network misleads because that’s not the condition the current research addressed.
We found these headlines around the globe this morning:
Uncovered at last, the gene that may herald a cure for baldness
Hair Loss Gene Identified – Male Pattern Baldness Cure Around the Corner?
Bald gene may help find cure
HealthDay was among the more calm and reasoned voices when it reported:
“The finding won’t immediately lead to a better treatment or cure… it’s just a tiny little piece of the puzzle.”
Comments (2)
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Alan
April 15, 2010 at 10:04 amThe Chicago Trib had it right back in 2004:
Rugs, drugs, plugs: Just say no
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-03-16/news/0403170001_1_hair-growth-hair-transplants-bald
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like