Newspaper criticized for painting a too rosy picture of cancer vaccines

Posted By


In his Columbia Journalism Review “Observatory” column, Curtis Brainerd blasts a Pittsburgh Post-Gazette story on cancer vaccines. He urges other journalists to “display far more caution and judiciousness than found in the Post-Gazette.”

It’s a good piece.

But we don’t know why CJR singled out the Pittsburgh paper for this one instance. We review stories like this all the time on

You might also like


Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Judith Kronick

April 14, 2010 at 11:50 am

A related medical journal article (and commentary):
in Archives of Internal Medicine ( Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(6):515-518. Published online March 16, 2010) and Commentary )
“Cancer and the Media How Does the News Report on Treatment and Outcomes?” Jessica Fishman, PhD; Thomas Ten Have, PhD; David Casarett, MD, MA