NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.

"No data is better than bad data" – caution about AF ablation preventing dementia

Posted By

Categories

Tags

Heart rhythm specialist physician-blogger John Mandrola begins his blog posting today with that line, referring to recent news about a study of ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) also reducing the risk of dementia.

In it, he links to our site because of our frequent cautions about overenthusiasm for preliminary findings presented in abstracts at medical/scientific meetings. He writes:

“I am not saying the study is dishonest or false, just preliminary.

The troubling aspect for a provider of AF care is the obvious and overt sensationalism. Taking an abstract and proclaiming that AF ablation reduces dementia risk is irresponsible and misleading.

Shouldn’t the storyline read something closer to this:

An observational, single-center, uncontrolled and un-blinded preliminary report–presented in abstract form only–suggested that a cohort of AF patients who were healthy enough to undergo AF ablation had a lower risk of dementia. The data are yet to be published in a peer reviewed journal, and the dementia-preventative effects of AF ablation, if any, are yet to be defined.

AF therapy is complicated enough already. Over-sensationalized misinformation in the lay press make it even harder to explain the issues at hand to patients.”

It’s a smart analysis. Read the whole blog post.

You might also like

Comments

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Comments are closed.