The May issue of Prevention magazine published a brief under the bold headline, “FOODS THAT FIGHT FIBROIDS.” Excerpt: “Milk does a body good – especially the uterus, where it helps prevent benign tumors. Boston University researchers found that African American women who had four or more daily servings of dairy were 30% less likely to develop fibroids than those who had less than one a day.”
Sorry. You’ve gone too far. An observational study can’t prove that any food “fights” fibroids and can’t prove that any food “helps prevent benign tumors.”
Strong statistical association – OK.
Proof to warrant causal, action verbs like “fight” or “helps prevent” – NO.
The words matter. As is, this is not just a matter of semantics – it’s inaccurate.
Opinions on other issues in news, journals, PR, advertising, marketing
A lot of interesting workshops are happening now at the #NBCCSummit! @garyschwitzer, the publisher of @HealthNewsRevu, is discussing new cancer research news. #BeBold
Comments (2)
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Robert Blade
May 17, 2010 at 5:49 pmOne other caveat to this: African Americans tend to be far more lactose intolerant than people of Northern European stock. It’s irresponsile to promote dairy (never mind its hormones and other harmful additives) to an at-risk group.
–Robert Blade, Jacksonville, Fl.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like