NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine -

Checkup on evidence-based treatment of stroke (or not)

Posted By


Another excellent piece by John Fauber of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, “Drug that could stop stroke isn’t always used.” This story also includes good graphics and reminders for readers on warning signs of a stroke, how to be prepared for a stroke emergency and what to do in such an emergency.

And, in that newspaper’s partnership with, a version of the story appears on that site as well under the headline, “Do Certified Stroke Centers Deliver Speedy Treatment?

You might also like


Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.


July 28, 2010 at 5:56 pm

Given the modest benefit (based on what I’ve read) this may not be a terrible tragedy. This probably happens because:
1) the window for treatment is 3 hours from onset of symptoms. I assume a lot of stroke patients delay coming in
2)With the single biggest complication of tPA being intracranial hemorrhage. I suspect there’s a persistent reluctance (even when all the dots are aligned) to give a therapy that may WORSEN the symptoms.