July 22, 2010

Some critics not so sweet on sweet corporate ties to American Dietetic Association

Posted By

Tags

See the LA Times’ Booster Shots piece that lets readers know about who’s behind a survey touting the benefits of chocolate in a healthy diet. And the piece also addresses some concerns about chocolate industry corporate sponsorship of the American Dietetic Association. Excerpt:

“The Hershey Center stepped up its commitment to your health this week by becoming a corporate sponsor of the American Dietetic Assn., the professional group for nutritionists and dieticians. (The organization can be found online at EatRight.org. In doing so, Hershey joined an esteemed list of health food purveyors, including the Coca-Cola Co., PepsiCo and Mars Inc. (Yes, the soda companies also sell juice and water, and Mars makes Uncle Ben’s rice, but that doesn’t make them health food companies.)

The folks at Fooducate are understandably appalled (if not surprised) that the ADA would let itself be influenced by big bucks from candy and soda makers. “Instead of a very simple message – ‘less candy’ – we’ll hear ‘moderation,’ ‘balance,’ ‘chocolate is healthy’ and other messages that help nudge consumers to buy more snacks instead of less,” according to a post on the Fooducate blog.

The Sustainable Food blog got to the heart of the issue: “If the world’s largest group of nutrition professionals is in bed with junk food giants like Pepsi and Mars, how can consumers believe any of the organization’s dietary advice?” Instead, the blog suggested that “folks can get better dietary direction from a fortune cookie.” “

Screen shot 2010-07-22 at 10.34.40 AM.jpg

Comments

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Zebe

August 14, 2011 at 5:11 pm

To Gary Schwitzer:
Thank you for calling attention to this appalling situation. As a certified health teacher, I’m concerned about all the junk food the children in our schools consume. The American Dietetic Association is another example of fast and processed food corporations influencing the information that Americans are being “fed” through organizations that are supposed to be health “watchdogs.” Unfortunately, these organizations are just “hotdogs” for the processed food industry.
Writers like you help sift out truth from all the deception.
Thanks again for this article. Articles like yours will someday stand out as the beginning steps towards healthier generations of Americans.

Thomas

October 4, 2011 at 7:43 am

Hershey’s “Center for Health & Nutrition” has also sponsored the “Hershey Moderation Nation” in collaboration with the ADA to promote “moderation” and a “balanced lifestyle”. In my opinion this is nothing more than a slick PR campaign. Thanks for another enlightening bit of information Gary.

COMMENTS button We welcome comments, which users can leave at the end of any of our systematic story reviews or at the end of any of our blog posts.

But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.

You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.

This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.

We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.

We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.

There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”

The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:

“Shed light, not just heat. Facts, challenges, disagreements, corrections — those are all fine. Attacking the person, instead of the idea or the interpretation, is neither acceptable nor helpful.”

We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.

And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.

The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.