A new TV station general manager comes to town and the station’s old news director is asked to leave.
And so it goes in the brief life (or lives) of a TV news director.
WCCO-TV, Minneapolis, news director Scott Libin, whom I’ve always considered one of the most thoughtful, classy guys in TV news, was let go yesterday. It happened – he told a newspaper reporter – on the same day he was headed to the dentist for possible root canal surgery. “I’ve had better days,” he told the reporter.
I wrote to Libin today saying I was so sorry – for the dental problem, that is. I wrote that I’m not sure TV news deserves him any more. He was in this position less than 3 years.
He’s the kind of guy who always had an open mind to my criticisms of TV news in general and even of his own station’s reporting. For example, I wrote him last week after posting about his station’s “poor reporting of mammography recommendations.”
He responded quickly, writing “I reviewed the piece as promised, Gary, and I get what you’re saying.” After I wrote to him today he brought up that incident again: “By the way, I did follow up on that mammogram story and had a good conversation — maybe even a teachable moment or two — with the manager who oversaw it. I think your point was valid. Thanks for the tough love.”
That kind of class will be missed. He’s just lost his job and he’s thanking for me for my criticism of a story a week ago.
Meantime, on the TV news health beat, I recently heard from a local TV news medical reporter at a top-market station that management had criticized a recent back pain story the reporter had done. The news director chastised the reporter for showing only two elderly people in the story, issuing an important reminder that the station and the reporter should strive to show patients who are in the station’s target demographic group – people ages 35- 54.
Gag me.
And that’s not an isolated example. I’ve heard similar stories from TV reporters in other markets.
So, seniors, don’t look to TV health news to learn about the health concerns of your “demographic.” But I wouldn’t advise that anyone else – of any demographic – do so, either.
Opinions on other issues in news, journals, PR, advertising, marketing
Puleeeeease... this 'game changer' weight loss drug causes more nausea and vomiting than a placebo. Some game, some change. My friend Gary would spank you for using the eighth word medical reporters should never, ever use. @garyschwitzer @thackerpd
https://www.healthnewsreview.org/toolkit/just-journalists-writing-tips-case-studies/7-words-and-more-you-shouldnt-use-in-medical-news/ https://twitter.com/OttawaCitizen/status/1361426796126830597
A scary @statnews Op-Ed warns that govt attempts to rein in Pharma may cut off access to "life-changing" drugs.
It takes @garyschwitzer to let us know: the author spent 10 years as Pfizer's public-policy chief. https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer/status/1360325022578053123
.@TranspariMED criticizes STAT op-ed for not disclosing pharma funding of author’s institute - similar to criticism we’ve made of STAT op-eds in the past. @transparify @ThinkTankWatch @icer_review https://www.healthnewsreview.org/2021/02/transparency-watchdog-criticizes-stats-non-disclosure-on-pro-pharma-op-ed/
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Gerri Shaftel Constant
October 12, 2010 at 11:54 amI once got called on the carpet for using grey haired people in a story about anti-aging hormones. This was more than 10 years ago. Producers of JAMA’s and other VNRs might want to keep this in mind if they want to get increased play of their weekly feeds.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like