The Popular Science website – Popsci.com – reports with breathless enthusiasm about claims that McGill University Health Centre/Montreal General Hospital performed a “world first, a completely robotic surgery and anesthesia.”
By now, unless you’ve been living in a cave, you know about DaVinci surgical robots. This team also used an anesthesia robot, nicknamed “McSleepy.” The surgery was done on a man’s McProstate.
(Can you imagine the informed consent for this one?)
Popsci.com called it “groundbreaking surgery” and stated that the robots’ “surgeon masters kept them closely monitored, of course, but the use of the bots provided for a higher level of precision than would be achievable with humans alone.”
How that alleged “higher level of precision” translates into patient outcomes is quite another matter – as there are a number of legitimate questions raised about outcomes after robotic surgery.
Yet Popsci.com leaped ahead to calling the surgery “a success.” By what metric? Because the patient survived? (Although we’re not told even that.)
The Popsci.com story is strikingly similar to the news release issued by McGill.
The following photo comes from McGill’s website. Aren’t you impressed by the high-tech scene? With the patient’s face blurred out, one can even forget that there’s an element of human touch to medicine.
Meantime, for another glimpse of how medical centers promote their new robotic toys – for which they spend a lot on marketing and public relations, see this news release from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. It touts the “Region’s First Single-Incision, Robot-Assisted Kidney Repair.”
There’s an interesting quote in the news release from one of their doctors: “The results are the same as open surgery or laparascopic surgery, but there are no visible scars, and the recovery time is much faster.”
Hmm. The results are the same (no data provided) but no scars and faster recovery time.
Which outcomes? Where are the data on benefits and on harms?
I’m waiting for the next medical center news release: “First On Our Block To Successfully Treat Toenail Fungus Completely By Robot.” The outcomes were the same, but no one had to actually touch that awful toenail.
Comments (4)
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Mike
October 26, 2010 at 5:20 pmTo paraphrase from The Simpsons, “I, for one, salute our new robot overlords.”
Health First
February 11, 2011 at 6:57 amHi I work for Health First and we recently were shooting a TV commercial to promote our da Vinci Surgical system and put together a funny video with some of the outtakes of our da Vinci robot for your viewing enjoyment please check it out hopefully it will make you smile Watch YouTube Video
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like