NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.

Scans that are "little more than pretty pictures with a big price tag & potentially serious side effects"

See this Reuters story that includes questions about new criteria for doctors to decide when to use CT scans to diagnose heart problems – criteria written by a group of cardiologists and radiologists from several medical societies.

Critics charge that the criteria could lead to “overtesting” when “”Right now we don’t have any data showing that cardiac CT is as good as or better than other tests we have.”

You might also like

Comments

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Comments are closed.