That’s how author Sarah Vowell opens her terrific book, “The Wordy Shipmates,” which I just read. I’ve seen her interviewed but had never read one of her books. Now I can’t wait to jump into the next one.
That opening line was used by one of our medical editors, Dr. John Wong, in reviewing a health news story a while back.
It fits. It especially fits in the context of medicine – or of health journalism, for that matter – when we hear from people whose beliefs or intuition cloud their view of evidence. We’ve seen that quite a bit in discussion of various screening tests recently.
Vowell’s book, about Puritans coming to America, is thought-provoking throughout on that opening theme of the danger of a belief.
Opinions on other issues in news, journals, PR, advertising, marketing
Monday at #ADA2021, an infectious disease epidemiologist, a journalist, and a researcher shared perspectives on communication of risk in the era of COVID-19: http://ow.ly/ROfR30rMeE7 @AstleyCM @garyschwitzer @berthahidalgo @ADA_DiabetesPro
Shoutouts to @susan_bewley @drkevinknopf @MichaelBaum11 in this call for more than fawning coverage from press releases for these kinds of stories.
Also, linked history inside goes back 5 years just on Grail apparently trying to become Holy Grail. https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer/status/1408849696416841731
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Patricia Laffin
February 8, 2012 at 11:58 amReally? You liked this book? It’s a hate-filled political rant with no attempt at truly understanding the Puritans, or anything else for that matter. It’s just filled with the author’s smug, self-righteous views disguised as a serious book.
Gary Schwitzer
February 8, 2012 at 9:30 pmPatricia,
Yeah, I really liked the book. I didn’t see anything hate-filled in it.
Guess this is why we have the marketplace of ideas and a free and open exchange that doesn’t always end in agreement.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like