NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.

Journalists' inconsistent reporting on drug costs

Posted By

Tags

In the same week that some journalists reported that “many don’t take prescriptions because of cost,” other journalists gave us reminders of how inconsistently they help readers think about drug costs.

NBC drug cost.jpgYesterday, for example, the NBC Nightly News reported its second story on the high costs of Makena, the first FDA-approved drug to prevent premature birth. Good job. But then they immediately followed with a brief story on Merck’s boceprivir drug for hepatitis C – and NEVER MENTIONED cost. The screen shot at left is from the NBC website, showing how they “packaged” the two Makena drug stories (online and on the air over two days time) around the hepatitis C drug story for which cost apparently was a non-issue.

Wrong. Stay tuned.

They weren’t alone. Undoubtedly many newspapers across the country did what my local Star Tribune newspaper did, telling the story of Medicare’s consideration of paying for the expensive prostate drug Provenge. But above that little Provenge cost story, the Strib placed a big banner story for the Merck hepatitis drug, and, again, never mentioned cost.

drug costs headlines.jpg

Nitpicking? I don’t think so.

First, there are at least two horses in the race for the first protease inhibitor for Hep C to reach the market; Vertex’s telaprevir and Merck’s boceprivir. It’s probably safe to say that the cost will be in the thousands per month. The costs of existing treatment is about $70,000 for 48 weeks of treatment.

Folks, as a country, we have a limited pot of money to spend on health care. Costs are always important. Yet 70% of the 1,469 stories we’ve reviewed on HealthNewsReview.org as of this moment fail to adequately address costs.

That’s the population-wide, national problem.

For the individual concerns, go back to the top of this post. “Many don’t take prescriptions because of costs.” Costs are always important.

You might also like

Comments

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Comments are closed.