Rachel Zimmerman tells a story that many people must be able to relate with – “Medical Sticker Shock: An Infuriating Encounter With A Cost Calculator.”
The guy delivers the nut graf:
“Here I was trying to do the right thing by figuring out the cost. But clearly, the system isn’t ready for prime time when it comes to transparency.”
Zimmerman and Carey Goldberg do a terrific job on the CommonHealth blog. I was on a New England Science Writers panel with Rachel, Daniel Carlat and Ivan Oransky back in January. Video and audio available online. It was moderated by blogger Alison Bass, with lots of help from Carol Cruzan Morton and Dianne Finch.
Opinions on other issues in news, journals, PR, advertising, marketing
Monday at #ADA2021, an infectious disease epidemiologist, a journalist, and a researcher shared perspectives on communication of risk in the era of COVID-19: http://ow.ly/ROfR30rMeE7 @AstleyCM @garyschwitzer @berthahidalgo @ADA_DiabetesPro
Shoutouts to @susan_bewley @drkevinknopf @MichaelBaum11 in this call for more than fawning coverage from press releases for these kinds of stories.
Also, linked history inside goes back 5 years just on Grail apparently trying to become Holy Grail. https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer/status/1408849696416841731
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Rick Evans
April 5, 2011 at 10:02 pmIt’s a hard to take WBUR Commonhealth seriously considering that it started as a RomneyCare propaganda soapbox for its healthcare industry lobbyists and advocates.
Under Martha Bebinger Commonhealth’s daily parade of paternalistic nanny-statists were dedicated to telling its readers how grateful they should be for being extorted by the state into paying into the most expensive, profligate health care spending state in the nation.
If you posted a reply to their parade of 1000 word missives your reply was posted in type 1/2 the size to reduce its visibility and importance.
Unless you’re feeding at the health care dollar trough you might want to skip CommonHealth.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like