NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.

Urologists’ report: more prostate cancer surgery driven by more robotic procedures

“Adoption of robotic technology fueled rapid growth in the use of prostatectomy at a time when the incidence of prostate cancer decreased, investigators reported (at an American Urological Association conference in Washington, DC, according to MedPageToday .

They quoted Hugh J. Lavery, MD, of Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York:

“The cancer outcomes and fiscal policy implications of this shift may be substantial.”

And the story explains that utilization questions aren’t merely limited to surgery:

Alluding to an earlier presentation on current practices in prostate cancer therapy, session moderator James Montie, MD, said a lot of discussion and speculation have focused on the question of “whether the pie is the same size and is being sliced differently or is the pie growing.”

“There is other evidence to suggest that radiation therapy use also is increasing, largely in the form of [intensity-modulated RT],” said Montie, of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. “I think there is pretty good evidence that the pie is getting larger.

“More people are being treated with supposed definitive therapy. Why is that, in an era when the incidence is going down and there is no reason to believe that the disease is a lot more dangerous than it used to be? It raises issues about utilization.”

You might also like

Comments

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Comments are closed.