Why I’m optimistic about future of health care journalism – 2nd of 5 part video series

Posted By

About 70% of more than 1,500 stories reviewed were graded as unsatisfactory by our reviewers for:

• failing to adequately discuss costs

• failing to adequately quantify benefits (often exaggerating benefits)
• failing to adequately quantify harms (often minimizing or ignoring harms)

Yet – after our team of reviewers has worked on these reviews every day for more than 5 years – I’m optimistic because the flaws that have been identified are not that difficult to fix. A growing number of training opportunities – such as the NIH Medicine in the Media event – can help journalists struggling with how to evaluate evidence and how to scrutinize the myriad claims made about health care interventions.

In part 3 of this series tomorrow, I’ll remind journalists of the help that’s available to them in most communities to evaluate evidence and to scrutinize claims.

You might also like

Comments

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Comments are closed.