NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.

Crowd-sourced Health News Rater project

Posted By

Tags

Ben Goldacre drew our attention to what he calls a “miniature crowd-sourced version of the meatier HealthNewsReview.org project.”

It’s a new site run by biostatisticians and it’s called the Health News Rater.

This is an interesting “low-threshold” citizen-science website approach. Here’s a screenshot from the site:

We welcome any new players in this field of trying to improve not only health care journalism – but the impact of that journalism on citizens/consumers/patients.

Our reviews are conducted by journalism peers and by medical evidence experts.  But we love the “wisdom of the crowds” input as well.

Of course, readers can now comment on any of our reviews and add their own “grades” in a comment field appearing at the end of any of our story reviews.  (It looks just like the comment field below this post.)

We also email the reporter or someone from each news organization that published a story we review – an automatic feedback mechanism that is our best attempt to foster quality improvement. It would be useful if the new project provided such feedback directly to the sources as well.

———————————————————————————————-

You might also like

Comments (4)

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Jeff Leek

January 12, 2012 at 11:46 am

We over at Simply Stats love the work that healthnewsreview.org is doing. Our project is designed to compliment the more substantive approach that expert review this site can give. We are amateurs when it comes to web development so our project is still in its infancy. But we do think that crowd-based rating can be a nice compliment to expert review, especially in reporting of the very basic information we ask of users.

We are also looking for help in development of our site, we want to stay simple, but make the slight less amateur if there are any web developers who are interested.

    Jeff Leek

    January 12, 2012 at 12:06 pm

    We have added a link to HealthNewsReview on our help page!

Jeff Leek

January 12, 2012 at 11:46 am

We over at Simply Stats love the work that healthnewsreview.org is doing. Our project is designed to compliment the more substantive approach that expert review this site can give. We are amateurs when it comes to web development so our project is still in its infancy. But we do think that crowd-based rating can be a nice compliment to expert review, especially in reporting of the very basic information we ask of users.

We are also looking for help in development of our site, we want to stay simple, but make the slight less amateur if there are any web developers who are interested.