The following cross-post was originally published by Barbara Feder Ostrov, deputy editor of ReportingonHealth.org.
I’ve been a frequent contributor to the Health Wonk Review (#2 on her list) and hosted the carnival on December 22.
———————————————————————————————————————————————–
One of my New Year’s resolutions is to read more of the insightful health and medicine blog posts that pop up in my RSS feed. One good way to keep up with those posts is to follow blog carnivals, which are periodic round-ups of blog posts on similar topics, either by email or RSS.
Here are a few of my favorites:
1. Grand Rounds: One of the granddaddies (2004) of health blog carnivals, this weekly round-up offers posts from leading medical bloggers. It’s now hosted by Grand Rounds founder Dr. Nick Genes of Blogborygmi and Dr. Val Jones of BetterHealth.com.
2. Health Wonk Review: Hosted by a rotating group of bloggers, this health policy-focused carnival recently included posts on efforts to overturn health reform, a hard look at accountable care organizations and retiree health benefits.
3. Cavalcade of Risk: Henry Stern of InsureBlog coordinates this blog carnival of risk and insurance-related posts, many of which deal with health insurance.
4. Carnival of Journalism: Started by Spot.us founder David Cohn, the December edition featured blogs on the best Christmas presents journalists could receive from programmers and vice versa.
Other great but apparently on-hiatus carnivals include The Benefits Package, hosted by Evan Falchuk of BestDoctors.com, which focuses on employee benefits, and Change of Shift, a compendium of great nursing blog posts hosted by Emergiblog’s Kim McAllister. It’s worth checking out their archives.
I’ve contacted Falchuk and McAllister to see if these carnivals will be resurrected at any point and will let you know what I hear.
What have I missed? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Photo credit: Matt Perich via Flickr
Opinions on other issues in news, journals, PR, advertising, marketing
The tale of two “negative” studies. Or, how spin is applied to make research findings look more impressive. A must read. https://johnmandrola.substack.com/p/the-tale-of-two-negative-studies
The @nytimes chose to interview one of the editors of the @AnnalsofIM (publisher of this paper) who "gushed with extraordinary glee: It’s huge! There are very few things that reduce your mortality by 30%."
Turns out coffee is not one of those few things despite all that glee. https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer/status/1533202075928215558
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Comments are closed.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like