The following is a guest post from Harold DeMonaco, one of our expert story reviewers on HealthNewsReview.org. He is Director of the Innovation Support Center at the Massachusetts General Hospital.
—————————————————————————————————————————————
An orthopedic colleague recently provided me with a wonderful article from the British Medical Journal. The editors of the Journal have a penchant for publishing humorous articles. Here are a couple of examples:
Last week they provided us with yet another provocative study entitled, “Orthopaedic surgeons: as strong as an ox and almost twice as clever? Multicentre prospective comparative study.” The title alone is sufficient to garner the interest of just about any clinician.
The study compared the grip strength and intelligence quotient of two groups of physicians, orthopedic surgeons and anesthesiologists. The study was prompted by a comment made over the operating room table by an anesthesiologist that reflected badly on the intelligence of his orthopedic surgeon colleague. The authors examined the grip strength of 36 orthopedic surgeons and 40 anesthesiologists. Given the stereotype, it was not surprising that the orthopedic surgeons had significantly great grip strength that their colleague anesthesiologist. What is unclear is if this is related to an occupational difference (orthopedic surgeons play with saws, drills and hammers; anesthesiologists with intravenous catheters and syringe) or inherent physical prowess. It should be noted that 6 female anesthesiologists were originally entered into this phase of the study but their data was not used in the analysis of grip strength due to a lack of sufficient number of female orthopedic surgeons.
As I noted, the study also looked at the relative intelligence level of both groups using a standardized instrument. Much to the chagrin of most members of the anesthesia community and to the delight of the orthopedic community, orthopedic surgeons appear to have significantly higher IQ’s than anesthesiologists (at least based on the sample collected). Even more interesting was the median IQ of both groups. Orthopedic surgeons had a median IQ of 105.19 (sd 15) and anesthesiologists had a median IQ of 98.38 (SD 14.85) using the MENSA Brain Test version 1.1.0. By definition the median IQ of the general population is 100 (sd 15).
The authors’ conclusions are noteworthy, “The comedic repertoire of the average anaesthetist needs to be revised in the light of these data. However, we would recommend caution in making fun of orthopaedic surgeons, as unwary anaesthetists may find themselves on the receiving end of a sharp and quick witted retort from their intellectually sharper friends or may be greeted with a crushing handshake at their next encounter.”
If you notice a somewhat smug look on the faces of orthopedic surgeons over the next few weeks, this may be the initiating factor.
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Susan Fitzgerald
January 5, 2012 at 3:43 pmHa. Love British humor. Reminds me of the absolutely serious and scientific testing of the statement regarding whether bread does indeed fall butter-side-down. (Nope.)
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like