NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine -

2 pieces on overdiagnosis – including self-diagnosis

Posted By


I’m in my element, among 600 or so attendees at the Association of Health Care Journalists’ annual conference in Atlanta.  But, as a result, I only have time today to point you to a couple of interesting pieces:

A Reuters special report on how an aggressive campaign for esophageal cancer screening feeds overdiagnosis debate.

On the Washington Post’s Wonkblog, “How WebMD convinces us we’re dying.”

You might also like

Comments (2)

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Greg Pawelski

April 20, 2012 at 11:37 am

Online hypochondria is not that much different than imaging studies, which are ladened with CYA impressions/interpretations. If patients take each and every one of them literally, they’d find out they are more doomed than they actually are. If you look long and hard enough for anything, you’ll eventually fine something! They call them American Pickers.