Gary Schwitzer is founder and publisher of HealthNewsReview.org.
The marketing of breast screening knows no bounds.
A friend sent me this story, commenting, “Just wow.”
And why would a plastic surgeon do breast exams? Follow the money.
Opinions on other issues in news, journals, PR, advertising, marketing
A great read on this weekend’s NYT claims of a cure for Type 1.
Cure for Type 1 diabetes? We’ve been down this road before with NY Times https://www.healthnewsreview.org/2021/11/cure-for-type-1-diabetes-weve-been-down-this-road-before-with-ny-times/
"But it is the framing and the emphasis of the #journalism by a leading science journalist at a leading newspaper that demands scrutiny. It has an impact on readers and on sick people that may cause harm by promoting false hope about extremely preliminary research"
👍👏💪 truth https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer/status/1465399358137024518
Why we should still miss healthnewsreview. https://twitter.com/garyschwitzer/status/1465399358137024518
Comments
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Pat Battaglia
April 30, 2012 at 10:52 amPlastic surgeons, due to the nature of their work, are trained to screen for breast cancer. That does not justify this gaudy, tasteless objectification of women. Two women who are dear to me have passed away from breast cancer in the past two weeks. It is an ugly, ugly disease. There’s nothing pink, pretty, or sexy about it. We have to stop using breast cancer “awareness” as an opportunity to ogle.
Kate Murphy
April 30, 2012 at 11:08 amSex sells. But what it is selling may not be very good for you.
It was unclear just was exams were being offered in the Boob Bus, but since they were being done by a plastic surgeon and not a radiologist, I’d assume they weren’t mammograms.
The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends against teaching breast self-examination (BSE). (D recommendation.)
USPSTF also ” concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the additional benefits and harms of clinical breast examination (CBE) beyond screening mammography in women 40 years or older.”
Given the short time the bus was scooting around Manhattan sporting pink leather, I doubt there was a good discussion between women and their doctors about screening risks and benefits for the 40 to 49 year olds, and heaven knows how many under 40’s were “screened” inappropriately.
But the worst part of this is that women of the right age “examined” in the bus may think they have really been screened — had a mammogram — when they haven’t been.
Good advertising, bad, bad science.
Susan Fitzgerald
April 30, 2012 at 11:55 amHuh…bet you didn’t imagine yourself writing that headline! Wow indeed.
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like