NOTE TO READERS: When this project lost substantial funding at the end of 2018, I lost the ability to continue publishing criteria-driven news story reviews and PR news release reviews - once the bread-and-butter of the site going back to 2006. The 3,200 archived reviews, while still educational, are getting old and difficult for me to technically maintain on the back end of the website. So I am announcing that I plan to remove these reviews from the site by April 1, 2021. The blog and the toolkit - two of the most popular features on the site - will remain. If you wish to peruse the reviews before they disappear, please do so by the end of March 2021. After that date you may still be able to access them via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - https://archive.org/web/.

BMJ blog on Nestlé & diabetes foundation: comfortable bedfellows?

Posted By

Tags

Deborah Cohen, on a BMJ blog, writes:

Nestlé has just announced a three year partnership with the International Diabetes Federation (IDF)—an umbrella organisation representing national diabetes societies from around the world— as part of its contribution to the fight against non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Such diseases include cardiovascular disease, cancer respiratory illness and diabetes.

The IDF is slightly more coy about the partnership publicly. Nestlé has announced the collaboration on the homepage of its website, but the company’s logo has been simply added to the IDF website in amongst the other supporters of projects—mainly drug and medical technology companies.

The move is in sharp contrast to the current sentiment within other parts of the global nutrition movement. Organisers of the World Public Health Nutrition conference held in Rio this month declined to take corporate sponsorship from companies such as Nestlé. Indeed, in the run up to the UN summit on non-communicable disease (NCD) last September—in which the IDF played a prominent role— the notion of public-private partnerships in tackling disease caused a rift between some non-governmental organisations and groups representing businesses.

But the IDF believes there is a role for partnership: “There is clear consensus that the conflict of interest between public health advocates and tobacco companies is fundamental and irreconcilable,” a spokesperson told the BMJ, adding: “IDF believes that the food industry cannot be approached in the same way. Smoking is harmful in all its forms and at any level of consumption. The same cannot be said for food. Food is a basic necessity, and the right to adequate food is an enshrined human right.”

But campaigners are worried that education allows marketing through the back door. In some countries were they will not be able to brand teaching materials, but in other countries they will. They also believe that messages will be filtered–they’ll never say restrict the amount of junk food you eat.

Indeed, the company removed a page from an educational book in Russia following a complaint from campaigners. Its “Programme about correct nutrition – working notebook for school children” showed a mother telling her child that eating chocolate rather than a sandwich before an exam would help her manage the difficult exercises.

 

 

You might also like

Comments (2)

Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.

Ken Leebow

May 16, 2012 at 10:22 am

Nestle made another recent alliance … with the Girl Scouts … http://bit.ly/IY9TYC … but it ain’t about health.