Angelo Volandes, MD, a physician at Massachusetts General Hospital, wrote an opinion piece published in the Boston Globe today. He tells the story of a patient dying of cancer, with whom he brought up the topic of end-of-life care options:
“For the next hour I introduced a vocabulary as foreign to her as spondee and trochee were to me. Life-prolonging treatment and CPR, ventilators and intubation, DNR and DNI — terms that she would need to learn quickly. Unfortunately, I was trying to teach her a new lexicon in the midst of the haze of nausea and hospitalization.
Dazed and confused, they looked at me blankly. Words often fail us in medicine. How could I explain these abstract ideas and treatments? Most patients think hospitals and medical interventions look like what they see on television where most survive CPR beautifully; the truth is most people with advanced incurable cancer do not do well with these interventions and often suffer at the end of life.
Finally, I tried a different approach. “Do you mind if we take a walk through the ICU?” I said.
If words failed me, perhaps seeing the intensive care unit would help. Seated in a wheelchair …Helen got a tour of the ICU, where she saw an intubated patient on a ventilator and a patient having a large intravenous line placed. Her decision-making would be informed by what she saw, instead of having to imagine what my terms really meant.
When we arrived back at her room, she looked at me and said, “Words, words, words. . . Angelo, I understood every word that you said — CPR and breathing machines, but I had no idea that is what you meant.”
I was reprimanded by the ICU staff for bringing Helen and her husband on that tour, but I was quickly forgiven. Evidently, many felt, like me, that patients deserve to be educated in order to make informed decisions about end-of-life choices.”
That was years ago when he was a medical resident.
Today, he goes on to explain, he and others use video decision aids to help people think about care options.
It’s an important piece; give it a look.
Opinions on other issues in news, journals, PR, advertising, marketing
Come on, NY Times; you must do better than this. Important research doesn’t need hype and the “breaking news” BS doesn’t help readers or patients. https://www.healthnewsreview.org/2022/03/nyt-proclaims-breaking-news/
Our editorial team was blessed to have Sharon as a contributor during our best years. As this obit states, she was “kind, patient, wise, thoughtful and generous.” Thank you, Sharon; now rest in peace. https://journalism.wisc.edu/news/in-memoriam-sharon-dunwoody-1947-2022/
We’ve written about the hype of liquid biopsies for years (see link in comment below). And now this…. https://www.statnews.com/2022/01/12/medicare-shouldnt-cover-liquid-biopsies-early-cancer-detection/
Comments (2)
Please note, comments are no longer published through this website. All previously made comments are still archived and available for viewing through select posts.
Carol Countryman
June 18, 2012 at 6:39 pmOur youngest sibling just celebrated his 65th birthday. The other three of us are 79, 70 and 67. Two of us have had serious health issues (that at the moment are dormant) and two of us have been largely unscathed. A fifth sibling died of Lewy body syndrome two months ago, two weeks before her 80th birthday.
We are intelligent, educated, strong people. But we are not knowledgeable about end-of-life issues (although our sister’s situation gave us some insight) and the information in the Globe article is so very helpful. It goes hand in hand with a New York Times article I read recently that said most elderly people have an idealized vision of their final days, believing that they will spend a few days in bed and then die. The reality, so the article pointed out, is much more grim.
We live between Rochester and Syracuse, NY, and I hope that the hospitals there have subscribed to the idea of the video. We all know that we are going to die and we all, I’m sure, want that to be, as much as possible, in the manner we would wish.
Thank you for this important information.
Carol Countryman
Carol Countryman
June 18, 2012 at 6:39 pmOur youngest sibling just celebrated his 65th birthday. The other three of us are 79, 70 and 67. Two of us have had serious health issues (that at the moment are dormant) and two of us have been largely unscathed. A fifth sibling died of Lewy body syndrome two months ago, two weeks before her 80th birthday.
We are intelligent, educated, strong people. But we are not knowledgeable about end-of-life issues (although our sister’s situation gave us some insight) and the information in the Globe article is so very helpful. It goes hand in hand with a New York Times article I read recently that said most elderly people have an idealized vision of their final days, believing that they will spend a few days in bed and then die. The reality, so the article pointed out, is much more grim.
We live between Rochester and Syracuse, NY, and I hope that the hospitals there have subscribed to the idea of the video. We all know that we are going to die and we all, I’m sure, want that to be, as much as possible, in the manner we would wish.
Thank you for this important information.
Carol Countryman
Our Comments Policy
But before leaving a comment, please review these notes about our policy.
You are responsible for any comments you leave on this site.
This site is primarily a forum for discussion about the quality (or lack thereof) in journalism or other media messages (advertising, marketing, public relations, medical journals, etc.) It is not intended to be a forum for definitive discussions about medicine or science.
We will delete comments that include personal attacks, unfounded allegations, unverified claims, product pitches, profanity or any from anyone who does not list a full name and a functioning email address. We will also end any thread of repetitive comments. We don”t give medical advice so we won”t respond to questions asking for it.
We don”t have sufficient staffing to contact each commenter who left such a message. If you have a question about why your comment was edited or removed, you can email us at feedback@healthnewsreview.org.
There has been a recent burst of attention to troubles with many comments left on science and science news/communication websites. Read “Online science comments: trolls, trash and treasure.”
The authors of the Retraction Watch comments policy urge commenters:
We”re also concerned about anonymous comments. We ask that all commenters leave their full name and provide an actual email address in case we feel we need to contact them. We may delete any comment left by someone who does not leave their name and a legitimate email address.
And, as noted, product pitches of any sort – pushing treatments, tests, products, procedures, physicians, medical centers, books, websites – are likely to be deleted. We don”t accept advertising on this site and are not going to give it away free.
The ability to leave comments expires after a certain period of time. So you may find that you’re unable to leave a comment on an article that is more than a few months old.
You might also like